What you’ve done is produced a fanboy response to the game, completely biased by your personal taste in gameplay and passed it off as a good review by mentioning a single “poor” point at the end, which isn’t even the greatest of the flaws in this game.

While I agree the game is quite good, and very addictive, there are in fact many improvements that could be made to the game - if nothing else, balances in the multiplayer by reducing the strength and range of G18s, and adding some skill requirements for the use of the grenade launcher.

Moreover, “Special Operations” is not something everyone would agree has replaced Nazi Zombies. For one, it is a completely different idea in terms of playability, resembling an arcade game more than the tactical expansions added by MW2’s Special Ops. Thus is it less a replacement, and more a separate entity.

As my final point, I would like to point out the nature of Infinity Ward Net, more commonly known as IWNet. While I am aware that you are not a hardcore gamer, and play a more casual role in the gaming community - the nature of the servers has been a hugely disputed point in the gaming world. Replacing the traditional dedicated servers with a system that hosts them on random players forces us to suffer lag from those who have weaker internet connections, a problem prevalent on the PC version of the game. Since you have omitted what platform you reviewed the game on, we are forced to assume that your review applies to all platforms, and this provides a sense that you have ignored this flaw in favour of worshipping the game in all its glory.

Thank you.